# Prelude: The Immutable Secrecy

<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Our university education serves but one purpose namely the certitude. We are so certain that our views on subject matters are so very correct to the point of utter ignorance. For example, we do not realize that which we are force-fed as The Privacy laws, or something or other, are totally manufactured by foreigners in other nations feverishly working to enslave us by eroding our ability to safeguard secrets.</span>

<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: pre-wrap;">We ignorantly do not discern between the </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(251, 238, 184);">synthetic Privacy</span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: pre-wrap;"> and the absolute and </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(251, 238, 184);">immutable Secrecy.</span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: pre-wrap;"> We fail to realize that Privacy is a fluid concept that varies per foreign agents' needs and fickle mandates of their masters; while Secrecy is one fixed innate faculty and a concrete construct. Secrecy pervades not only in human individuation and societies but in all other organisms living on this planet! </span>

> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: pre-wrap;">In general the organism's inability to deploy secrecy regarding its existence opens it up for easy grab as food! Isn't that what is done to us? </span>

<p class="callout danger"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">We fail to realize that the so-called Privacy Laws are foreign verbiage exogenous to our societies and are manufactured by the very powerful agents of subjugation.</span></p>

**Example**<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">: Have you wondered why Google or Apple repeatedly update their binding privacy digital contracts? And incessantly give you a fake-option to opt out when they knowingly understand you cannot opt out. These privacy digital contracts, as we truly see their nature at this point of time, are instruments of subjugation. Ask the thousands of thriving businesses destroyed by both Google and Apple vis-à-vis these or other binding contracts which left their paying customers with impossible options to opt out.</span>

<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: pre-wrap;">This is </span>**a fallacy**<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: pre-wrap;"> , this is what is done to you: </span>

> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: pre-wrap;">A master says to you loud and clear that if you do not do such a task, he will kill you and burn your house down or you have an option to opt out! Which then he will kill you and burn your house down anyway! </span>

<span style="background-color: rgb(251, 238, 184); white-space: pre-wrap;"> You are being talked at, talked down by that master every single time you turn on and use any digital device. </span>

**Example**:

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD\_Act](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD_Act)

<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act or CLOUD Act (H.R. 4943) is a United States federal law enacted in 2018 by the passing of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, PL 115–141, Division V.</span>

<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The CLOUD Act primarily amends the Stored Communications Act (SCA) of 1986 to allow federal law enforcement to compel U.S.-based technology companies via warrant or subpoena to provide requested data stored on servers regardless of whether the data are stored in the U.S. or on foreign soil.\[1\]</span>

##### <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Extraterritorial scope</span>

> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The CLOUD Act allows United States authorities to request data from cloud providers and other covered service providers regardless of where the data is physically stored.\[26\]\[27\] The act is not limited to companies based in the United States. It applies to "all electronic communication service or remote computing service providers that operate or have a legal presence in the U.S".\[28\] Courts can require parent companies to provide data held by their subsidiaries.\[29\]</span>

© 2012-Present CCN Studios Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License